Posted on 04/07/2018 5:36:54 PM PDT by BenLurkin
“Diamond And Silk have been corresponding since September 7, 2017, with Facebook (owned by Mark Zuckerberg), about their bias censorship and discrimination against D&S brand page,” they wrote.
“Finally after several emails, chats, phone calls, appeals, beating around the bush, lies, and giving us the run around, Facebook gave us another bogus reason why Millions of people who have liked and/or followed our page no longer receives notification and why our page, post and video reach was reduced by a very large percentage,” echoing the complaints of many conservative and pro-Trump pages.
Here is the reply from Facebook. Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:40 PM: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community.”
The pair say it took “6 Months, 29 days, 5 hrs, 40 minutes and 43 seconds” to get a response, which they add the network said is “final and it is not appeal-able in any way.”
They posed several questions to Facebook and Zuckerberg, including, “What is unsafe about two Blk-women supporting the President Donald J. Trump?”
(Excerpt) Read more at theamericanmirror.com ...
Bake the damn cake!
“Facebook is skating on thin ice.”
It’s a platform that allows access to 2 billion people.
And Facebook is systematically restricting access to that platform based upon political content.
PRECISELY what the left warns about with respect to net neutrality. Facebook probably expended more energy and money than every other entity combined advocating for net neutrality.
Of course, they only wanted it to apply to transport, while they expected to be able to censor CONTENT.
They are just itching for an anti-trust suit.
To liars the truth is unsafe.
“1st and 14th amendment abuses.”
Those constraints apply ONLY to the Federal Government and the States.
The fascist Democrats say they want “net neutrality”. I have a feeling POTUS is about to give it to them. LOL.
They must be russian....
If I were holding any of their stock I’d be selling really quickly...I’m done on that site....
Those constraints apply ONLY to the Federal Government and the States.
Should anyone succeed in forcing Facebook to treat its conservative members fairly, you can rest assured the left will come for sites like this one and force the smaller players to accept noxious left-wing content. As long as FB is a private-sector business, government shouldn't force content.
Other than the Ayres-era FoxNews, the so-called right wing has never realized the need for multiple strong media outlets.
All this talk of Facebook tightening down to stop foreign interference is nothing more than an a vehicle to kick conservatives off of Facebook.
stay strong, Diamond & Silk.
the monolithic media, including social media, will surely die.
AUDIO: 6 Apr: WVTF: A Conversation with (Virginia Senator) Mark Warner: Russia, Facebook and the Trump Campaign
By Matt Laslo
(This report, provided by Virginia Public Radio, was made possible with support from the Virginia Education Association)
LASLO: Facebook has been under fire for this most recent leak. What role does Congress have in this to protect people’s data?
WARNER: “I first called out Facebook and some of the social media platforms in December of 2016. For the first six months, the companies just kind of blew off these allegations, but these proved to be true; that Russia used their social media platforms with fake accounts to spread false information, they paid for political advertising on their platforms. Facebook says those tactics are no longer allowed — that they’ve kicked this firm off their site, but I think they’ve got a lot of explaining to do.”...etc
http://wvtf.org/post/conversation-mark-warner-russia-facebook-and-trump-campaign
MAJOR SWAMP CREATURE, LASLO:
Matt Laslo: Reporter, Professor, Writer
Based on Capitol Hill, Matt Laslo is a reporter who has been covering campaigns and every aspect of federal policy since 2006. While he has filed stories for NPR and more than 40 of its affiliates, he has also written for Rolling Stone, The Atlantic, Campaigns and Elections Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Chattanooga Times Free Press, The Guardian, The Omaha World-Herald, VICE News and Washingtonian Magazine...
In 2011he graduated cum laude from The Johns Hopkins University MA in Government and Public Policy program. He now teaches there as adjunct political communications professor, as well as teaching journalism at Boston University and The University of Maryland...
You can read and listen to Matt’s stories here: Rolling Stone, The Daily Beast, The Guardian, Countable, The Atlantic, NPR.
https://www.mattlaslo.com/
By equating words with violence and feelings with physical harm, they end up with “words = physical assault”.
Taken to its logical conclusion, you get the liberal equivalent of lynch mobs seeking to kill the apostate or critic of the faith. He hurt your feelings, she disagreed with your sacred self, wounding you in all ways, and that’s attempted murder.
Just like Muslims who equate criticism of the faith with literal assault on all believers, so you can kill them in self-defense.
Use the Left’s weapon against themselves - the Race Card.
Oust zuckerberg, fb is too complex for one person to dictate. Make no mistake, zuckerberg completely rules fb in a dictatorial manner.
Now fb is being ‘weaponized’ (to use favorite left wing nut term) for left wing nut propaganda purposes.
Nationalize fb, ran by the people, and oust zuckerberg as first order of operation.
“As long as FB is a private-sector business, government shouldn’t force content. “
1. Facebook controls access to 2 billion people. That’s a media monopoly, even upon the assumption somebody could build a comparable platform to compete. The fait acompli is 2 billions users.
2. One could make a good argument that Facebook is in a completely different class than all other content providers. Only Drudge and Google/Youtube have anything approaching their control over the information landscape.
They are a monopoly “social network”. The only question is whether they should be broken up, or regulated.
But it’s time for the DOJ to write that legal logic and file the suit.
This is unbelievable. Unsafe? UNSAFE? Diamond and Silk, unsafe?
FB says decision is final and cannot be appealed.
I hope this blows up on Zuckerberg and FB.
I never joined FB...always made me queasy for some reason, but most everyone I know is on it, and some are leaving while others are tryimg to think of alternatives.
Zuckerberg is obviously a racist!
"Unsafe, how, white eyes?"
[/Jay]
I think I see a movie deal in these ladies’ future...
Zuckerberg is a cancer
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.