Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fso301

Dunno.
The Mark IV was getting a little long in the tooth and the Mark III was obsolete for anything but an assault gun chassis.
A simplified Panther and Jagdpanther might have been a good idea.
Problem was, the Panther the Germans built was larded up (which started out as a German T-34...) with gizmos inleaved road wheels and they couldn’t build them fast enough.
Tigers, though, were a waste of production lines and steel.


20 posted on 04/07/2018 10:43:36 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Little Ray
Dunno. The Mark IV was getting a little long in the tooth

Russians ordered that captured Panthers and Tigers be used until they broke down and then be abandonded. However, captured MK-IVs when broken down were to be repaired and returned to service.

Also, MK-IVs were still showing up on mid-East battlefields as late as 1973. Not the case for Panthers and Tigers.

The French and several Eastern Block nations used captured Panthers through the late 1940s but only until inventory of spares parts had been used up.

29 posted on 04/07/2018 11:36:23 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson