Glad we got that settled, I never made a God claim nor did Q. The constant harp of the President has been the state of the military equipment and readiness-wise. The 53E fleet has poor availability across the board and is reflected in the same poor state of readiness across the services. It isn't fly-by-wire, electro-mechanical, it doesn't die from an electrical failure.
Crashing cars that you can get close to to affect is quite different than targeting flying aircraft.
They certainly AREN'T coincidences they were caused by the policies of Congress and the last admin. Men died because of that.
Crashing cars that you can get close to to affect is quite different than targeting flying aircraft.
Only in the means.
The WikiLeaks Vault 7 described how the CIA and Deep State can easily hack a vehicles computer, and hence the car's throttle body and other mechanisms.
Aircraft, helicopters, ships - they can ALL be hacked (albeit in different methods and of different systems). If this were not the case, the DoD would not have spent millions to identify and construct defenses against these. But understand this: Hillary was caught selling SAPs for money. I have little doubt Barry Hussein did as well. What else did they sell? How much of our secret military technology (including vulnerability information) was sold to our enemies.
There are other ways. Meaconing is one (and has been around for decades). Even GPS systems.
And once again, the foundation of my opinion on this is that all of these military mishaps are also dovetailed with overt attacks, such as poison packages and letters in the mail to military bases, the terrorist attack at the gate of Travis AFB, and others we most likely don't know 100% about.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/travis-air-force-base-gate-possible-attack-new-details/
And to saywhatagain's point (by the way, I love your screen name), I don't know how a percentage could be applied to these accidents, unless one has hard data. I didn't say xx% were human error and xx% were attacks. From your post, it appears that Q made that claim. I don't know how he arrived at that and I cannot back up his assertion on statistics. My position is that I believe our military is under internal attack.
We already know the military and all of our servicemen and women have been cyber attacked, and continue to be. Back up systems are great - they are subject to the same vulnerabilities as the primary. I flew aircraft with multiple hydraulic systems. When I had an catatrsophic engine failure that threw compressor blades, #1 and #2 lines were severed just the same. The "back up" for flight controls is a razor thin margin if both are being targeted, or there is another system that is found vulnerable. Evil never sleeps.
Q implies that these attacks are not a coincidence. I agree with that premise. I know you don't. That's fine.
Let's agree to disagree rather than engage in this constant back and forth.