He didn't say that. He said 'coincidence?' and also said there are no coincidences. So what could be involved in all these events? The common thread in all except likely the Thunderbird F-16 is lack of readiness. In the case of the ships, training for bridge crews. Aircraft, shortage of flight hours for training and parts for maintenance.
The Harrier in Djibouti crashed on takeoff which isn't an unnatural occurrence.
53 crashes are again not uncommon unfortunately. Had 2 crash back in 2016 off Hawaii. See article:CH-53
The failure of Congress to fully fund the services flight hour program and causing them to use Operations and Maintenance (O&M) monies to support deployments is what I believe Q is referencing.
Look at the locations: Djibouti 2 crashes
SoCal basically desert 1
Nellis range complex (desert) 1
The woods down at Ft Campbell 1
For those who want to say their is a 'chip' or unauthorized takeover mechanism, then the question becomes why is the President allowing the flights when a clear danger is present? Swap out the components, software (pilots/crew) are more important than hardware.
Q
You are talking in circles.
Q implied (very clearly) that these crashes are NOT coincidences, and that they are statistically impossible.
I agree with you that our military readiness has been degraded by years of budget cuts, Sequestration (which was a huge budget cut on top of the already implemented budget cuts), and the horrible plague of Barry Hussein's mission to destroy our military.
Are training and operations crashes common. The military is a dangerous occupation. When flying, I often pushed things beyond the limit because I had to.
I lost some of my best friends to aircraft crashes, both in combat and training.
It's a dangerous business.
But our military is under Deep State attack. I believe that.
Breaking: Marines hospitalized after chemical attack on military base here are the details
We can agree to disagree.
Thanks for your informed comments.