[wbarmy]

"I have repeatedly apologized for the bad judgment I used and making the statement I did, but I do not believe repeating the words of the President of the United States is a crime. However, I will apologize again on behalf of myself, the President of the United States and all the media outlets who repeated his words both electronically and in print."

A non-apology apology, released through an attorney, and slamming on people for making her apologize for "repeating" what the President said. Although, that isn't what the President said, it is a paraphrase. And most of the outlets who "repeated" the words are also paraphrasing or doing commentary.

They are not on the street screaming at little girls. Like she was doing.

[Spruce]

No sincerity. No contrition. I am sure she sees herself as the victim. Because, you know, Trump!

[AppyPappy]

She thought the phrase was offensive so she KEPT SAYING IT.

Liberals!

[ExTxMarine]

So, if I scream “FIRE!” inside a burning theater, according to her, she can do it inside a theater that isn’t burning - I mean, after all, she is just “repeating the word[s]” that I said!

I think I may have to be on her side on this one!! Do I really need the /sarc tag?!?!

[Moonman62]

“I have repeatedly apologized for the bad judgment I used and making the statement I did, but I do not believe repeating the words of the President of the United States is a crime.

...

It’s not, but the way she did it is against the law.