Has anyone ever reminded you that demeaning another freeper personally is not appreciated here? Civil people find a way to say what they want to say without sneering at other freepers. His point of view has valid aspects, as does yours. This doesn't have to be a black-and-white, "either/or" matter—it can be "both/and", as in "our soldiers' heroism and loyalty to one another overcame even the prejudices of their backgrounds."
If one wants one's point of view to convince others, it's better to use a fact-based or objective tone rather than irritable anger and condescension.
This FREEPER should never have posted this. He also attacked everyone who disagreed with him and accused us of being both angry and guilty of wanting to 'erase history'.
Most anyone else would have backed off by now. He persisted to throw insults over things like where I was born for some reason. He also is a sloppy researcher.
Stay out of it. it is done as far as I am concerned.