[smoky415]

c. 10 U.S.C. A. § 333
The President can use the militia and/or the armed forces to suppress insurrection, domestic
violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy if: (a) it so hinders the execution of law of that State
and of the United States and it deprives citizens of constitutional rights (e.g. due process); or (b) it
opposes or obstructs the execution of laws or impedes the course of justice. In the event of the
deprivation of rights, the State is deemed to have denied its citizens equal protection of laws.

[nicollo]

c. 10 U.S.C. A. § 333

Oregon, maybe, but with California, I'd go the more fundamental route:

Article IV. Section 4. The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

By allowing illegal non-citizens free entry and massive voting fraud, California has effectively denied its citizens a "republican form of government" and deliberately allowed "invasion," which every crime by an illegal ought be deemed an act thereof.