Sigh. I'll defer to your superior knowledge of guidance and control systems, and set my engineering background and considerable study of hardware, software, and "assistaace" devices (cruise control, autopilot, power steering (both hydraulic and electric)) aside.
Below is an article that makes your case. Below that I have linked to the cited US Patents.
How They Plan to Control Everything In Your Life
US Patent 3,974,428 to Hafle
US Patent 3,976,997 to Hafle
US Patent 4,628,298 to Hafle
No thanks. I read the title and that was enough. There are however other sources that have just a little more validity.
In general, I respect what you post. Most often spot on and logical. Also in general, as soon as someone starts posturing with credentials they are intellectually lazy. Good for you that you are an expert in so many areas. My hat off to you for your many years of study. I do admire those that love learning. I am so sorry you decided to stop. Sad.
Again, we have information (which looks quite accurate, but what do I know) from AIM (”Q is a Psyop”). Is A.I.M. and ‘Aim4Truth’ the same people?
Until someone not tainted with overt agenda confirms all this (the conspiracy part), I’ll personally take it under advisement and not share without strong caveat.
I’m told patent law is quite arcane. Even the drawings ae only allowed to be done by specialized draftsmen and the attorneys charge above the going rate for the usual business services. I once tried to get a patent on something and the attorney set all my red flags and alarms blaring at 11+. When he realized I did not have deep pockets, he suggested a *design patent* and terminated the conversation.
I am suspicious of IoT and ready to believe the worst of the political figures named. But I want evidence that isn’t circumstantial.
For instance: IIRC, Abel Danger maintains Hillary, Michelle and I forget which other First Ladies have a group that owns the sensor patent. I can’t find any authoritative evidence.
This article says it’s an engineer who publicly owns patents while working for a DS/CIA front. Unless he’s a strawman paid off to be a cut-out, this looks shifty in an evidentiary sense.
BTW, who/what would be the trusted remote activity controller? Military personnel? CIA? The schematics shows something so large as to be suspiciously unwieldy. Too hackable, as well.
The ‘personal viewing device’ looks like SmartGlasses or whatever they were called. I’ve seen articles on contacts with web access, too.Pretty simplistic drawing, if that’s supposed to be the super-sophisticated patent drawing.
Cboldt,
Need some help; green eyes mentioned an “Uninterruptable Auto Pilot Control.”
I found references to it & the patent number.
“”The method and systems of the present invention provide techniques for automatically navigating, flying and landing an air vehicle,” states the report for the US patent number US7142971B2.”
Also mentioned here:
https://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/search-patents
Can’t find it at the patent site, could the number US7142971B2 be wrong?