Posted on 04/02/2018 6:59:34 AM PDT by mairdie
I am reminded of regimes like Pol Pot where, if you wore glasses, they figured you were an Intellectual who would probably cause trouble, so they killed you.
The Left doesn’t really like smart people. They like people who think of themselves as smart. A crucial distinction.
I heard somewhere that these companies are selling their gene databases to Fed.gov
What better way to track, monitor and predict of citizens, and also find the networks among them?
...and required!
In the year 2525
You’ll pick your son,pick your daughter too
From the bottom of a long glass tube...whoa-oh-ohh
So far all of these studies are ‘association’ studies, which have been notoriously flawed. At this point this is only speculative sensationalism.
“DNA studies are rayciss” in 3... 2... 1...
.
>> “In the year 2525” <<
If man is still alive, if Hildabeast can survive...
I suggest delayed gratification is part and parcel of good work ethic but I understand if some might see that as moving the goalpost.
...
I should add that the delay involves a bigger reward.
Get a piece of candy now, or get two pieces in half an hour.
What I have noticed is that people with really high IQ’s tend to be the last person to have any common sense when it comes to politics or moral decisions. They may be smart enough to calculate how to land a rocket on Mars and yet vote for Obama and follow anifia.
What I have noticed is that people with really high IQ’s tend to be the last person to have any common sense when it comes to politics or moral decisions. They may be smart enough to calculate how to land a rocket on Mars and yet vote for Obama and follow antifa.
Yep, worked with a mensa women, odd and not that bright on common sense.
You are playing in the margins there. Very few people have an IQ of 80 or 180.
The point is, no DNA test is going to tell you if a hard working person with a 100 IQ will be more successful than a lazy person with a 115 IQ. Similarly, no test will tell whether a sober person with a 110 IQ will be more successful than a drunk with a 125 IQ.
But wasn’t Pol Pot an intellectual too? He studied at Sorbonne University in Paris, didn’t he? He should have been principled and killed himself.
Actually, there are a lot of people with IQs of ~80 (or lower). Roughly 15% of the US population, in fact. There are not many at 180, though, that is for certain. And yes, an IQ test result of 110 or 125 can't guarantee performance (although your example is smaller % of population than my 80 IQ), it massively increases the odds - but those are still for relatively close IQs in the scheme of things. How about a 95 IQ (just a hair below average) vs a 125? The person with 95 IQ will need to work probably 3-5x as hard to get a phd as someone with 125.
I actually did that test once.
I took an IQ test sober, then had four drinks and took a very similar IQ test.
My IQ as expected, went down by 20 points. I was surprised the decrease was that small.
“What I have noticed is that people with really high IQ’s ....”
I’m curious how you know peoples’ IQs ????
Once people start breeding per their intellectual abilities, Leftism will die out within two generations...
AI will result in a massively overproductive industrial and servicing economy, making a good chunk of the population superfluous, I mean, moreso than now. ;^)
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/jameswatson/index
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.