I see you ignored the portion where I pointed out one of the more recent example of when q was correct months before the fact. A the mere oversight I am sure, Anyway I don’t want you to miss it so i’ll post it again.
50
Nov 2 2017
BIG DROP:
How did NK obtain Uranium?
How did Iran obtain Uranium?
Why did BO send billions (in cash and wire) to Iran?
Why the cash component?
Was the hostage component a cover?
For what?
Could any of the cash component be handed off to other people?
How many planes carried the cash into Iran?
Did all land in Iran?
Did all land in the same location?
Why is this relevant?
Who controls NK?
Who really controls NK?
#674
Feb 06 2018
Public interest [keep high].
U1 FBI informant.
Q
Informant provided FBI evidence Russia aided Iran nuclear program during Obama years
A former undercover informant says he provided evidence to the FBI during President Obama’s first term that Russia was assisting Iran’s nuclear program even as billions in new U.S. business flowed to Moscow’s uranium industry.
William Douglas Campbell told The Hill his evidence included that Russia was intercepting nonpublic copies of international inspection reports on Tehran’s nuclear program and sending equipment, advice and materials to a nuclear facility inside Iran.
The internet is full of 1.5 hour videos that take apart Q posts like that one. It's a fun hobby for retired people, I'm sure.
Sadly, a lot of the Q advocates have taken to only speaking in riddles, like the Guru. It's fun, but it's a dodge.
What is the sound of one hand clapping, Grasshopper? Enough with that already.
My question is what things can fairly be attributed to Q. That is he said, in fairly clear language (given his question / haiku format) X and then Y happened.
My Fact Based Q Score Card is a list of things he (or what I perceive to be the majority of his interpreters) have predicted.
The prediction of video of Hillary was one of his most precise, would you not agree?
And it hasn't happened yet.
You know, there is a lot of potential upside to having a skeptic, like me, list these things out. It could be really great, if some point in the future the quite specific things I have listed begin to happen.
You can joyously point to my Score Card, like some officer in the US Navy who kept warning his superiors about the Japanese Navy in the run up to Pearl Harbor could point to the smoking wrecks in the Harbor and say "I told you so! NOW you know I was right!!.
And, to be clear, that would thrill me. (I'm not a fan or defender of Hillary or Obama or their minions.)
You should be more enthusiastic about my score card!
Here, specifically since you posted it twice are my comments/ replies on this post.
- How did NK obtain Uranium?
I don't know. I'm sure their are various theories. I don't see how this can make a score card item. If you do, please educate me on what this mean, if you know.
- How did Iran obtain Uranium?
Again, don't know. Don't see how it could be a score card item.
- Why did BO send billions (in cash and wire) to Iran? Again, don't know. What sort of prediction is made here. I already have "Barack Obama will be arrested".
- Why the cash component?
- Was the hostage component a cover?
- For what?
- Could any of the cash component be handed off to other people?
So, Q is encouraging people to dive deeper into Obama's treasonous transfer of money to Iran. OK, that's cool. That's a good thing for people to explore, but I'm not seeing any explicit predictions coming out of this to add to my scorecard, as either fulfilled or unfulfilled.
- How many planes carried the cash into Iran?
- Did all land in Iran?
- Did all land in the same location?
- Why is this relevant?
- Who controls NK?
- Who really controls NK?
Ditto. Interesting stuff to speculate about, nothing in the way of a verifyable claim (that I can detect) is made here.
So, there you have it.