Making the twitter rounds....
Posted on 03/24/2018 10:04:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
The internet is full of 1.5 hour videos that take apart Q posts like that one. It's a fun hobby for retired people, I'm sure.
Sadly, a lot of the Q advocates have taken to only speaking in riddles, like the Guru. It's fun, but it's a dodge.
What is the sound of one hand clapping, Grasshopper? Enough with that already.
My question is what things can fairly be attributed to Q. That is he said, in fairly clear language (given his question / haiku format) X and then Y happened.
My Fact Based Q Score Card is a list of things he (or what I perceive to be the majority of his interpreters) have predicted.
The prediction of video of Hillary was one of his most precise, would you not agree?
And it hasn't happened yet.
You know, there is a lot of potential upside to having a skeptic, like me, list these things out. It could be really great, if some point in the future the quite specific things I have listed begin to happen.
You can joyously point to my Score Card, like some officer in the US Navy who kept warning his superiors about the Japanese Navy in the run up to Pearl Harbor could point to the smoking wrecks in the Harbor and say "I told you so! NOW you know I was right!!.
And, to be clear, that would thrill me. (I'm not a fan or defender of Hillary or Obama or their minions.)
You should be more enthusiastic about my score card!
Here, specifically since you posted it twice are my comments/ replies on this post.
- How did NK obtain Uranium?
I don't know. I'm sure their are various theories. I don't see how this can make a score card item. If you do, please educate me on what this mean, if you know.
- How did Iran obtain Uranium?
Again, don't know. Don't see how it could be a score card item.
- Why did BO send billions (in cash and wire) to Iran? Again, don't know. What sort of prediction is made here. I already have "Barack Obama will be arrested".
- Why the cash component?
- Was the hostage component a cover?
- For what?
- Could any of the cash component be handed off to other people?
So, Q is encouraging people to dive deeper into Obama's treasonous transfer of money to Iran. OK, that's cool. That's a good thing for people to explore, but I'm not seeing any explicit predictions coming out of this to add to my scorecard, as either fulfilled or unfulfilled.
- How many planes carried the cash into Iran?
- Did all land in Iran?
- Did all land in the same location?
- Why is this relevant?
- Who controls NK?
- Who really controls NK?
Ditto. Interesting stuff to speculate about, nothing in the way of a verifyable claim (that I can detect) is made here.
So, there you have it.
I’ve read that SCOTUS justices can have SS security or not, and he chose not to have them at that retreat or whatever it was. So he did not have SS security at that time.
Okay, thanks, jostled my memory. So Scalia did not have the US Marshall security then.
I like your line of thinking. I’m in.
Paper toy, Scalia treasured his privacy and tried to hide from the marshalls. While greatly subject to debate, it may have cost him his life. The details surrounding Scalia’s death are I triguing.
Some good news. Hope he is executed.
Yeah it’s called the Socratic method, and we’ll keep speculating and connecting the dots about what has happened and is happening and you keep whining that you don’t understand and lashing out at those that do...
“The Socratic method, also can be known as maieutics, method of elenchus, elenctic method, or Socratic debate, is a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presumptions.”
Now again I see your selective editing and that you tried ignoring that the U1 uranium informant that just told us how they got the uranimum.
You been posting the same lame negative crap for months, I’ve seen many people post multiple examples to you, you choosing to ignore them is your problem not mine.
BTW By your criteria Atlanta won Superbowl 51
Yes!
Go, Trump. MAGA
“Paper toy”?
The circumstances surrounding Scalia’s death are far more than intriguing AFAIAC, they’re very dangerously suspicious.
Thanks edzo4.
I just don’t have the time, energy or patience to deal with the tread detractors today. If/when they wish to actually contribute something positive to the thread I will pay attention.
I ceased to be shocked about that a looooong time ago. Blue dress and cigar ring any bells for them? They still don't get it either. Sleaziness aside, Clinton LIED under oath and that was the freaking issue! (I know you , know that, that was for lurkers).
Here are the answer you ignore, are you just too lazy too look. to ignorant to care, or are you just a troll?
How did NK obtain Uranium?
Uranium one deal + mining it in NK it’s their natural resource https://thediplomat.com/2015/08/satellite-imagery-north-korea-expanding-uranium-production/ -
North Korea enriches it themselves, unlike Iran they don’t have people watching their moves on the ground: https://www.38north.org/2017/01/yongbyon011817/
NK has been working with Pakistan on enrichment etc: https://thediplomat.com/2016/08/the-long-history-of-the-pakistan-north-korea-nexus/
How did Iran obtain Uranium?
Uranium one deal
Why the cash component?
So the money could never be traced
Was the hostage component a cover?
Yes.
For what?
An excuse to send them the money.
Could any of the cash component be handed off to other people
Yes
How many planes carried the cash into Iran.
There were 2 deliveries.
Where did the planes carrying the cash depart from and land?
Geneva Switzerland departure
Did all land in Iran? Did all land in the same location?
No.
Why is this relevant?
The money wasn’t sent to just one agent
Who controls NK?
Kim Jong Un
Who really controls NK?
CIA? -”The Organisation and Guidance Department of the Korean Workers’ Party (the OGD is the crux of real, as opposed to symbolic, dictatorial power in North Korea)
http://newfocusintl.com/north-koreas-hidden-power-system/
So glad you cleared that up, as I was thinking, “Oh, no, here is another acronym I haven’t learned yet!” :)
Yay!
Making the twitter rounds....
I know right? My head is so full of codes and acronyms! I have to be careful when I am relating the info to others that I don’t launch into it, as they are not reading the thread. LOL
That’s Hate Speech in downtown Austin.
Hell, it’s hate speech in Cedar Park/Leander anymore!
And it hasn't happened yet.
Well, I think a large part of the problem is the conflation of specific Q posts, and the various interpretations of them. As a matter of fact, Q has never "predicted" or noted any scheduled release of an HRC video.
In post #854 (Mar 6 2018 01:09:09 (EST), 563806) he posed a question (absent the correct punctuation):
Is the stage set for a drop of HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5).
Later on March 6, he answers an anon post in post #862 (Mar 6 2018 11:17:11 (EST), 567637) with more questions about the topic. The anon said:
Drop the video! Play it in times square.
to which Q replies:
Stage set?
Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are regulated?
MSM is controlled?
Use logic!
Trust the PLAN.
Q
Now, have a lot of others made all sorts of predictions as to when the video would be released? Yes; too many.
But a fair reading of Q's actual words on the topic does not yield any prediction of a date. In fact, Q seems to be pushing the audience to understand that no such video will be released until the stage is properly set (i.e., social media outlets regulated, MSM "controlled").
This is but one example as to how Q posts have been distorted and twisted by others (some with good intentions, others not) to set up false hopes that have yet to be realized.
It is a fine line that is often lost in the hysteria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.