Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: eyeamok
In other words, some are trying to redefine 'blackmail'. Other than money, what is the purpose of a porn star and a Playboy Bunny trying to expose supposed and alleged trysts with a private citizen who happened to become, a decade or so later, the President. I'm not sure the purpose at this point.

To paraphrase The Hilldog, "What difference, at this point, does it make? Was it a horny billionaire out for an evening of fun, or was it a honey trap to gain notoriety and money?"

3 posted on 03/23/2018 6:27:36 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT
Given what the media ignored or covered up with Democrat Presidents such as FDR, JFK, LBJ and Bill Clinton, an alleged affair 10 years before Trump was elected should be meaningless.

It just gives the media another topic for their non-stop war on the President.

But Mueller's team is no doubt trying to concoct some crime out of it--maybe from the fact that Stormy Daniels was paid for her silence before the election.

7 posted on 03/23/2018 6:35:17 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SERKIT

The bunny’s interview was quite biased and absolves her of any responsibility.
“ I was a playmate bunny, synonymous with an easy lay.”
“ He had sex with me on the first date.”
“ He didn’t use a condom.”
“ He offered me money for sex. Shaming me.”
“ I was so ashamed, I continued to have unprotected sex with him for 9 months.”
“ Isn’t he an awful man?”
How much money is she being paid to say this, do you think?


23 posted on 03/23/2018 7:43:09 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson