I predicted that there would be a scramble to find some “scientific” basis for transgenderism. The science needed to catch up with the policy. I suspect this is junk science.
“I suspect this is junk science.”
One can bet the farm that this is junk science.
A good indicator is to ask, “Does the ‘research’ support progressives?”
If “yes”, then by definition it will be junk science.
I’m sure these same fruitcake scientists will claim that there are also 20 genes linked to the big bang or beginning of existence!
Yes, probably similar to the global warming “science”.
Mostly Levi’s would be my bet. Do they still make Jordache?
Why isn’t this work being done on diseases that kill or disable people?
If taxpayer money is being spent on this, I am not comfortable with this amount of attention and money going to something that affects a minuscule part of the population.
I suspect you are right! There is the 'X' chromosone and the 'Y' chromosome if either of those are missing you have a 'neuter' all else as you say, is junk science.