Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

Oh, great. Moron Scott allowed POLICE to petition for GVROs. Shouldn’t petitions be from people who actually more intimately know the person? Police cannot know everybody that well!


94 posted on 03/17/2018 3:04:49 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The US Constitution ....... Invented by geniuses and God .... Administered by morons ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
" or if the person has other firearms or ammunition that were not seized or voluntarily surrendered when he or she was taken into custody, a law enforcement officer may petition the appropriate court under s. 790.401 for a risk protection order against the person." FS 790.401 ".. . A petition must:1. Allege that the respondent poses a significant danger of causing personal injury to self or others by having a firearm in his or her custody or control or by potentially purchasing, possessing, or receiving a firearm, and be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath stating the specific statements, actions, or facts that give rise to a reasonable fear of future dangerous acts by the respondent." Such information needed on such an affidavit is not likely to come from someone who does not have intimate knowledge of the necessary facts.
111 posted on 03/17/2018 6:28:28 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson