To: JudgemAll
The market says people prefer the cheap ticket over the fast plane
With volume would the price not go down? If you accelerate at altitude is the boom still an issue for someone on the ground? Aeronautics is certainly out of my wheelhouse.
To: gibsonguy
You cannot get voluminous airframes from an aircraft designed above the speed of sound. Also the energy and maintenance cost still is prohibitive.
The only possibility is a business jet or military purposes
21 posted on
03/16/2018 9:54:12 AM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucifiedc)
To: gibsonguy
The market says people prefer the cheap ticket over the fast plane With volume would the price not go down? If you accelerate at altitude is the boom still an issue for someone on the ground? Aeronautics is certainly out of my wheelhouse. Poor people shouldn’t be flying anyway. Air travel now is no different than riding a Continental Trailways bus with the urine and shit sloshing around all day behind you.
23 posted on
03/16/2018 10:38:46 AM PDT by
atc23
To: gibsonguy
The market says people prefer the cheap ticket over the fast plane Paying an extra $1,000 to save an hour is only of interest to people whose time is worth $1,000/hr.
30 posted on
03/16/2018 12:24:46 PM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big governent is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson