Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Thank you Cboldt! I am old, but I do not remember Mae at all. Or any of those occurrences mentioned and didn’t know how much credence to give it.


459 posted on 03/14/2018 9:20:35 PM PDT by Becki (Watch and pray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]


To: Becki
-- I am old, but I do not remember Mae at all. --

"Old" is relative anyway. I never heard of Mae until I read the material at your link. I know of Mark Lane, but just never read about the fate of the Nazi infrastructure beyond the headlines "Hitler in Argentina" and similar, until that thread of Q stuff came up last week.

Doesn't take much reflection to figure "hell yes, the US 'excused' some," for example you've no doubt heard of the praises for Werner von Braun. No way he was the only "smart guy" that the US (or better said, "the money people") wanted to exploit going forward. Always, "follow the money" is good advice, and certain resources and expertise are as good as money.

Whoever the power players are behind the scenes, and I submit knowing those details is a curiosity unless you are "with them" and "doing battle with them," there is a group of sometimes cooperating and sometimes competing forces that use the general public as serfs on a plantation. That is the human condition, always has been. Platitudes and charades (and bread and circuses) are provided to keep the people from becoming restive.

In all of history, the US is an outlier. First time ever the people really did overthrow that usual order of things. It's long gone now, the money people have effectively been using us stupid Americans as serfs for over a hundred years. But, we get to vote and we have a free press!

And assuming for the sake of argument (I happen to think this is true) the money people were engineering a world war, naturally they don't want to be exposed, and will do all they can to prevent it. Many people will buy "Conspiracy to start a war? What are you, nuts?" Of course the accusation of "conspiracy theory" is going to be leveled, especially if the conspiracy theory looks back to family or other ties that bind the conspirators.

One last thought here. I find it interesting that the term "conspiracy theory" is automatically taken as "kook." That association doesn't exist for theories of science, or theories of crimes (see every indictment ever, for a theory of a crime). I also think history shows us plenty of examples of inter-governmental conspiracies that aim to join forces in order to exploit riches and the public. It is simply not rational to think these sorts of effort have been eradicated from humanity.

467 posted on 03/14/2018 9:44:36 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson