[Cboldt]

-- I also think Q was attempting, not to rewrite history, but to point to things TODAY that have been affected by history, i.e. the E.U., globalism, the Catholic Church, ANTIFA, George Soros. --

"Rewrite" was a bad choice of word on my part. I view it as "correcting" or 'setting the historical record straight." And I agree that history set up the current situations.

I think we're all on the same page, that drawing attention to the historical connect the dots carries a substantial risk of running the plan off the rails. Knowing whether the US and world got to this point by a 100 year old bloodline-laced conspiracy, or by organic "survival of the fittest in an orderly political process" doesn't matter as much as securing the borders, MAGA, and prosecuting the current crop of criminals.

[bagster]

Concur, Cboldt. :)

[txhurl]

100 year old bloodline-laced conspiracy

---

That bloodline needs it assets seized globally - HA! now I’m a globalist! - for human trafficking if they are to be defanged.

[sargon]

Knowing whether the US and world got to this point by a 100 year old bloodline-laced conspiracy, or by organic "survival of the fittest in an orderly political process" doesn't matter as much as securing the borders, MAGA, and prosecuting the current crop of criminals.

Well said. Such debates can wait until after we deal with the here and now. That should be the laser focus. Until then, they are conjecture—even if Q is the source...