The Rothschilds will have you offed if you suggest any reporting of Hitler might be misleading. I think that’s where Q is going but is about to be labeled a holocaust denyer and get shot down.
Yep. Went too deep. Pulling back. Saving Israel for last.
It's the world we live in.
There's an easy way to avoid being called a Holocaust denier—don't deny the Holocaust.
Q needs to focus on the here and now, and not dredge up controversial/outlandish takes on history, such as who is related to whom.
Angela Merkel is the current Chancellor of Germany, and who she's related to is irrelevant—or should be. She is to be judged on her own qualities and beliefs as an individual. Who cares who she's related to?
On another note, am I to take it that some here are accepting as an absolute fact that Justice Scalia was murdered? I've seen no evidence of that, and nobody gets the benefit of the doubt to have it accepted as truth for merely suggesting it.
Same goes for the child sacrifice/HRC is a pedophile stuff. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
I don't know how much of this stuff has been directly asserted by Q and how much is just others' filling in the blanks, but IMHO, we need to focus on facts, and what can be confirmed. At the moment, I remain unconvinced that Q has any superior standing as an arbiter of truth. I'm intrigued, but also skeptical and cautious, because sometimes I'm seeing "words being put into Q's mouth", so to speak.
I confess that I haven't been privy to every Q post or every Q thread on FR.
One thing I know for sure, though, is that if Q veers into "third rails" such as anti-Semitism or holocaust denial, then he'll discredit himself and lose me altogether. Citing individual Jewish elites such as the Rothschilds as powerful and threatening is one thing, but broad-brushing is quite another.
It also is the case that Q may being interspersing his own opinion with some facts. Caution is advised, and skepticism is warranted, so while I hate trolls as much as the next person, I hope that these threads can still include a healthy level of critical analysis.
Just my stream-of-consciousness 2 cents' worth regarding a phenomenon I haven't drawn a definitive conclusion on as yet...