I see less value in plumbing history compared with a steely-eyed approach to setting a present and future.
The courts will use "de facto officer" doctrine to allow most acts to have force, even though those acts have flawed authority underneath.
Feds Bust CEO Of Company Providing Ultra-Secure BlackBerries To Sinaloa Drug Cartel
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-11/feds-bust-ceo-company-providing-ultra-secure-blackberries-sinaloa-drug-cartel
What was it Q said about blackberries?
# # #
Rosie Unmasked Tweets Exposes Fusion GPS - Links HRC directly to Glenn Simpson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3638998/posts
In the Freep post, mentions Fusion GPS ties to the UAE.
A few days back, from the NYSlimes - Mueller’s Focus on Adviser to Emirates (UAE) Suggests Broader Investigation
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/03/us/politics/george-nader-mueller-investigation-united-arab-emirates.html
Playing them like a fiddle, I suspect...
In defacto officer instances, EOs and Congressional votes are needed to undo the damage. That is happening and has been happening since Inauguration. At the same time, investigations have been launched and are in progress to build legal cases against individuals.
It’s just slow and we have to work around the remaining loyalists.
No way can they let stand acts signed by criminals and voted on by the coerced/blackmailed. Most of the crap is unconstitutional anyway.
What if the non-eligibilty was proven to be a conscious criminal fraud?