[Fantasywriter]

How minutely is it assumed that Trump studies Q? It’s one thing to be aware of a poster on 8chan who ostensibly supports Trump [and there is no actual *evidence* that Trump even knows this much; it’s all part of a long chain of assumptions] and quite another to know that ‘Q’ is cheerleading for Sessions, Rosenstein and Mueller.

[trebb]

No way he is ignorant of Q's existence or posts - whether or not he "studies" Q is up for grabs, but the "Q movement" isn't hidden under layers of obfuscation...I enjoy some Q posts and the conversations they elicit but I'm not a "true believer" - it just seems Q is serving as a rallying point for exposing/intimating a lot of the subterfuge going on in the Deep State.

I can't see how Q is of any benefit to the Dems or they would be pushing it.

Lack of reaction to Q only means that reacting isn't considered helpful at this time - or maybe ever. It's either helpful, hurtful or benign and one might assume that the reactions/lack of reactions are considered the most useful actions/lack of actions for the circumstance - I didn't see the Q sign that Trump was supposed to have made but to assert Q is a Deep State tool is about as nonsensical as putting all one's eggs in the Q basket.

For all I know or care, Q is a smart 14 year old having a lot of fun and not worth pushing or quelling.