Btw, you don’t give a lot of attention to the FISA warrant issue. It’s critically important, however. Namely, when Rosenstein signed off on the 4th illegal FISA warrant, he committed a felony. It was well known at that time that the dossier was nothing more than unverified opposition claims and accusations. Comey admitted as much. Yet Rosenstein presented the dossier to the FISA judge as confirmed, reliable evidence (against Trump). He did that solely as a means of fixing the election against Trump/in favor of Hillary. It was literally criminal.
Yet this law-breaking anti-Trumper (Rosenstein) is the person—the sole person—Sessions placed in charge of deciding whether to investigate Trump for a NON-Crime, AND in charge of selecting which Hillary-fixer should spearhead the coup.
How on earth can you make excuses for Sessions??? At a bare minimum a felony-committing Hillary shill should not have been given sole authority over Trump’s fate. Are you aware that Rosenstein had to give Mueller a ***conflict of interest waiver*** in order to put him in charge of the witch hunt/fishing expedition??? How can you defend that??? It’s abusive anti-Trump treachery AT BEST. No conservative should want any part of justifying it.
Regarding the FISA warrant issue, let me be clear about one thing:
I’m not a fan of Rosenstien or Mueller, and none of my comments should be construed as me defending either of them. It’s true I don’t believe they are a serious threat to Trump at this point. In fact, I’m sure Trump has already figured out ways to use them as pawns to his advantage. But no, I certainly don’t like either of them and I consider them both to be the enemy.
The only player I’ve defended is Jeff Sessions. I believe we are not seeing nearly enough of the way this is playing out behind the scenes to judge him so harshly.
I also believe all the fuss over Sessions’ recusal manifests a hyperbolic exaggeration of the capacity ANY Attorney General could possibly have had under these circumstances to defuse the RussiaGate fervor last spring, or to limit or wind down the investigation over the last year.
I think it has been handled deftly by Trump with Sessions doing and saying exactly what Trump asked him to do and say. At this point, the strategy of disciplined non-obstruction has paid off handsomely - the investigation appears to be sputtering out and last year nobody thought it ever would.
And again, its naive to take public statements at face value.
In time, people will realize that Sessions has been misjudged, and that Trump’s relationship with his AG has been grossly underestimated.
But again - you and I aren’t going to agree on Jeff Sessions - at least not any time soon.