To: Billyv
The question becomes if the DS gives up the Clintons will that satisfy Q to allow the DS to regroup? As Q has said, "No Deals."
Deep state giving up the Clintons will be hard. They know she is psycho enough to "take them all down with her." And she will, so that keeps her relatively safe from her own people.
If you ask me. And you did. :)
774 posted on
03/09/2018 11:45:10 PM PST by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: bagster
Snowden is not anyone of the people that I dont want to get a deal. Obama, HRC, Holder, Lynch, Comey, Rice, Clapper, Brennan, Yates etc Q has the hard on for Snowden. 40/60 What he may be involved in could be a National Security issue. 💀
789 posted on
03/10/2018 12:26:08 AM PST by
Lopeover
( The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: bagster
Deep state giving up the Clintons will be hard. They know she is psycho enough to "take them all down with her." And she will, so that keeps her relatively safe from her own people.Not if we take them down first. Each time one is taken down, an opportunity to get closer to taking her down occurs. People will try to save her bacon, but when it comes to saving her bacon versus saving their own bacon, many will choose their own over hers. I know that I would. Of course, I'm not deep state. I don't think I even play deep state on the internet.
Neutralizing the danger of arkancide is a big deal IMHO. If the Clinton/Rodham/DNC machine can no longer get to its enemies, then people will open up. The fear of death has served them well.
920 posted on
03/10/2018 7:48:03 AM PST by
meyer
(The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson