Sorry for the typo, Here is a better link to the article by Admiral Lyons on Seth Rich and DNC server hack.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/1/more-cover-up-questions/
This stuck out to me.
“One more unexplained twist is that on July 10, 2016, the same day Seth Rich was murdered, an FBI agent’s car was burglarized in the same vicinity. Included in the FBI equipment stolen was a 40 caliber Glock 22. D.C. Metro police issued a press release, declaring that the theft of the FBI agent’s car occurred between 5 and 7 a.m. Two weeks later, the FBI changed the time of the theft to between 12 a.m. and 2 a.m. Was the FBI gun used to shoot Seth Rich? Neither the FBI nor the Metro police will discuss.”
Thoughts?
Re thoughts on the stolen FBI guns and Seth Rich (your post #2331):
There’s a lot of guns in DC at any one time, so I don’t think the time coincidence is indicative of anything in and of itself.
But, working in the other direction, wouldn’t the FBI have ballistics data on its own guns? And, wouldn’t they have the bullets from Seth Rich? What I don’t know is how comparisons are done—whether the grooving and scratching of the bullet has to be compared against a known test fired bullet one at a time, or whether the process has been automated. If it’s been automated... then the information would pop right up, wouldn’t it?
Otherwise, if there’s no automation, they’d have to do a visual comparison against that specific gun, or any other specific gun they wanted to match. Maybe they would, maybe they wouldn’t.