To: nickcarraway
As Jimmy Durante used to say; “Everybody wants to get into the act!”
To: nickcarraway
Hollywood INVENTED and PERFECTED their “casting couch” explotation of women... and the cover-ups as far back as Fatty Arbukle’s accusations of murder in the 1920’s.
3 posted on
03/03/2018 3:10:37 PM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: nickcarraway
Others, like Lily (Barbara Stanwyck) in Baby Face (1933), use mens relentless advances to build their careers, turning sex into a tool for economic ascension.The first man who was seduced and betrayed by Stanwyck was played by the young, unknown John Wayne.
4 posted on
03/03/2018 3:16:13 PM PST by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon)
To: nickcarraway
Colleges used to teach Plato and Shakespeare. Now they teach “Me too” on the silver screen. I don’t think that’s a step forward.
5 posted on
03/03/2018 3:17:00 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: nickcarraway
The whole thing is dumbsville.
6 posted on
03/03/2018 3:19:27 PM PST by
karnage
To: nickcarraway
The idiot author of the article is wrong, Hollywood, using this theme, was showing what used to be called "CAUTIONARY TALES" and they were NOT "accepting" nor "promoting" sexual harassment or worse.
Prior to "THE CODE", some movies dealt with all kinds of social "problems" and everyday life in a rather open ( considering the time ) way. These were movies made for ADULTS.
9 posted on
03/03/2018 3:29:08 PM PST by
nopardons
To: miss marmelstein
Wanna put your two cents in, on this thread?
I've already posted a wee bit of film "history". :-)
To: nickcarraway
A lot of pre-code films played up sex (prostitution, gigolos, adulterers and love triangles, unmarried mothers, etc.).
They cover the male boss who hits on the bright eyed woman who comes to work at the office and the dominating woman who runs the company herself and has competing suitors.
But to a Stalinist, history always begins “today” and the written record means nothing.
11 posted on
03/03/2018 3:35:49 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Ask a lib if Alger Hiss colluded with the Russians.)
To: nickcarraway
Good grief! Men use power to get sex. Women use sex to get power.
History and sociology courses complete!
13 posted on
03/03/2018 3:46:57 PM PST by
DakotaGator
(Weep for the lost Republic! And keep your powder dry!!)
To: nickcarraway
“Moviegoers in the early 1930s watched films about such sexual aggression on a regular basis, suggesting the degree to which this behavior was known, if not tacitly condoned, by film producers who were, of course, all male. The Production Code certainly tamed such blunt plot lines.”
How does this author see this as condoning such behavior?
15 posted on
03/03/2018 3:54:54 PM PST by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: nickcarraway
H-weird has NO problem blasting all sorts of 'bdsm' and assaults all over the silver scree just as the havo NO problem with hundreds, if not thousands, of acts of firearm violence. Too them, if it can make them a buck......... Hey h-weird...... 🖕🏻very much.
19 posted on
03/03/2018 4:35:35 PM PST by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: nickcarraway
The battle of the sex’s is designed into the systems intelligently.
22 posted on
03/03/2018 4:56:04 PM PST by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson