As I opened my comment. I’m assuming the computer was subpoenaed for investigation. If that is not the case then it is a big deal.
However, if it was then it is no different then investigators making xerox copies of relevant records that were also legally subpoenaed.
Your brain is having a hard time transition to current technology. — That’s a troll especially for Nifster. He needed a good example.
Done, argue amongst yourselves.
Beating a now old horse.. it could be as you say, or it could be otherwise.
If they cloned her disk, and the only difference between her disk and the cloned disk, was which disk it was, no harm and no foul.
But, who could blame her for being overly suspicious at this point?
Why would you assume this with no knowledge? I guess you never had a drill sergeant to explain to you how assuming makes an ass out of you.
And your attitude doubles down on making an ass out of you.
You proved the others to be correct - you are a troll.
And all I did was point out that the same DIJ and FBI that were investigating are the same who are as dirty as sin in their FISA warrants and IRS schemes
Here you go troll. Read her story. No subpoena....she requested an investigation of her computer
https://pjmedia.com/trending/sharyl-attkisson-accuses-doj-secretly-switching-computer-hard-drives/
Only if they kept the originals and gave back the copies...and the Xerox copies contained an operating system for a PC.