Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

One percent is not statistically significant. They don’t know this?


7 posted on 02/28/2018 6:55:21 PM PST by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fungi

Here’s an excerpt from another idea to give everybody an idea of why this is significant:

With 4 million hospitalized patients receiving fluids annually nationwide, one in a hundred starts to add up, co-author and ER physician Wesley Self says in a statement.

The study’s authors estimate that more than 50,000 deaths could be avoided with the change and twice as many cases of renal failure. Even just at Vanderbilt, they estimate the switch almost exclusively to balanced fluids could save hundreds of lives a year.


13 posted on 02/28/2018 7:13:02 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Fungi

If the sample size is large enough, 1% can actually be a statistically significant result.


20 posted on 02/28/2018 7:59:21 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson