Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: zzeeman
Hmmmm...rereading got me thinking.

What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?

Totten v. United States, 92 U.S. 105 (1875)???

114 posted on 02/28/2018 11:51:01 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
I did a quick read through of the case that you linked, I am not sure I am following the relationship to the "What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?" question.

To this layman it sounds like the Court affirmed the judgement that the Court of Claims isn't the appropriate venue to settle these types of disputes (i.e., any disputes that would necessitate the revelation of secret pacts of a broad variety).

What am I missing?

116 posted on 02/28/2018 12:18:16 PM PST by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson