Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.

I was thinking more of how it could benefit POTUS against the very fake news media. For example when they were all calling him crazy.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-anti-trump-psychiatrists-are-mobilizing-behind-the-twenty-fifth-amendment - The removal of Trump using the Twenty-fifth Amendment is the aim of a newly launched social movement composed of mental-health professionals. The group, called Duty to Warn, claims that Donald Trump “suffers from an incurable malignant narcissism that makes him incapable of carrying out his presidential duties and poses a danger to the nation.”

Which is very similar to when Barry Goldwater sued fact magazine and won:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_v._Ginzburg - The court found that the evidence introduced at trial proved the defendants knew they were publishing defamatory statements and “were motivated by actual malice when they published the statements.”[2] The court found the defendants guilty of libel action based on the article Fact published. The plaintiff demanded $1,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages but Senator Goldwater was awarded $1 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages

This is the Fact article titled 1,189 psychiatrists say Goldwater is psychologically unfit to be president.

https://www.scribd.com/document/322479204/Fact-Magazine-Goldwater-1964

Trump has said he wishes US laws were more like the UK’s

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/24/media/donald-trump-sue-news-organizations/

In the States, the publisher’s statement is essentially presumed true, because the plaintiff has the burden to prove it false. In a libel lawsuit in Britain, the statement is presumed false, and the burden is on the publisher to prove each material fact is substantially true.

So we’ll see I guess.


1,621 posted on 02/25/2018 8:56:04 PM PST by edzo4 (Thank Q very much!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1614 | View Replies ]


To: edzo4

This is what’s interesting about Trump’s attorney’s lawsuit. Trump’s position as POTUS provides them shield but they have no such protection against Cohen & his name was mistakenly included in Steel “dossier”, etc., most likely because somebody said (spoke) the name “Cohn” and it was misinterpreted (possibly over a ham radio ... Ohr cough cough) - Cohen’s lawsuit is a potential goldmine of discovery!


1,623 posted on 02/25/2018 8:58:58 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies ]

To: edzo4

This is what’s interesting about Trump’s attorney’s lawsuit. Trump’s position as POTUS provides them shield but they have no such protection against Cohen & his name was mistakenly included in Steel “dossier”, etc., most likely because somebody said (spoke) the name “Cohn” and it was misinterpreted (possibly over a ham radio ... Ohr cough cough) - Cohen’s lawsuit is a potential goldmine of discovery!


1,624 posted on 02/25/2018 8:58:58 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson