I don’t know who you are or what your agenda is. Maybe you’re just a regular person like me trying to find out what’s true.
But I can tell you, when a sincere person’s belief is questioned, they tend to become more serious and focus on the content.
And when a non sincere person is questioned, very often they will resort to sarcasm or ridicule.
So again, I suggest accepting the null hypothesis and working from there.
The null hypothesis would be that Q is fake.
Continue to analyze Q with the null hypothesis as your founding premise. Very often this method will reveal aspects previously overlooked.
Everybody knows.....
I'm Batman.
He’s an excellent person with a very strong sense of humor.
Though some of us just let our orneriness out because we get sick and tired of seeing productive dialogue among bright, good-hearted patriots crapped on by clueless, immature, ignorant jerks.