We are all questioning - there might be a few here who have drunk the Jim Jones cooldaide re Q, but everyone else is trying to figure this out.
But like all theories to explain a pattern of facts there are two approaches: just debunk the whole thing, facts, theories, speculation and all - which is the nihilism of the left the descent into the void of nothingness - or you can try to adjust the theory to fit the facts, see if it fits new facts and see if the picture as a whole makes sense - it is what good scientists do and it is what good lawyers and historians (the one's who aren't being jackasses) do.
I think it’s difficult for some to hold both possibilities in the mind at one time.
Maybe Q is real. Maybe Q isn’t real.