Let’s see. One broke the Monica case before Drudge, but could not readily come up with his user name and then could not find his original post - tells someone else to do it
Another hates frauds so much he must tell everyone how to think. He spends all of his time telling us who “Q is not” instead of researching and finding out who “Q is”.
Then - we are to believe a known scammer and liar who suddenly decides to come clean and tell the truth.
Who is being naïve here?
In Texas we call that ALL HAT AND NO CATTLE. The rest of the world call them LOSERS.
Let’s see. One broke the Monica case before Drudge, but could not readily come up with his user name and then could not find his original post - tells someone else to do it
Honestly, I think it’s even bigger than that. If true, he is bragging that he went to a site that he thought Drudge used to write up his stuff. Found the story that had not been uploaded yet. He didn’t know if Drudge had even finished editing it. He stole it, and then copied the stolen material to FR!! Unbelievable. What if Drudge was still doing fact checking. He said there were edits, but only in punctuation. Imagine if Drudge needed to make more serious edits? He then went on to hint that at that time, Drudge quit linking to FR.
I cannot wrap my head around how risky that would have been. However, all in all, it probably didn’t happen.
Well put.
But Strac6 believes for-q-clinton so that makes it ok. For-q-clinton is the one that claims to have scooped Drudge on the Blue Dress story. They both claim to have been on this forum back in the day but got banned so had to change their screen names to get back on. Conveniently. They have a need to come to places they are not wanted. They are the turds in the punch bowl.
They make claims on their profile pages and in their posts that can't easily be disproven. But they also can't be proven. I believe they are both posers.