Wow! I don’t know Brenden Dilly but I’ve heard others say he’s good. I LOVE the thought of 12 military tribunals of 12 members each. It squares with information I encountered a few months ago saying that National Guard members were being trained as MP for GITMO and then more specific info indicating NG was also training staff to support tribunals. That information was “derived” so I didn’t set much hope on it. Lots of study re GITMO at that time, right down to bandwidth used on network (how do citizens get THAT info) suggested people in place receiving daily training/meetings at scheduled times.
I was particularly interested in information between 5:36 and 9:00 minute mark because I hadn’t hear it elsewhere.
Overall, as people have repeatedly told me Dilly is fairly good, WOW!!!
Agreed.
Qx took about 6-10 tweets to strongly suggest ways he could moderate some of his more outrageous emotionality to appeal better to older folks and better his chances of getting elected. He appears to have taken at least some of it to heart. That's impressive--given his general personality. We like him.
He seems to have an authentic super insider source. And, like Q-Anon, his source notes that some things may be distorted, misdirection, etc. for strategic purposes. Yet, 90+% of what Dilley has gotten has come true; been checked out as valid etc.
Don't know where you got your Gitmo info but that's impressive. Personally, I have felt in my spirit that most of the Gitmo rumors were essentially true. Time will tell.
Qx knows a National Guard General but hasn't been able to connect with him recently. Will be trying again.
I assumed Gitmo was a rather small enclave but the land area is a lot more than I expected. They could house thousands, 10's of thousands there if they wanted the expense of building etc.
I wonder how OBummer would feel housed in a cell with a rabid Jihadi while OB awaited execution. Traitorous jerk.
Interesting times we live in, for sure.
Certainly rumors are potentially quite unreliable and at least exaggerated. But not 100% of them 100% of the time.
It depends on a lot of factors. The sources are key--how well placed; how honorable; sharing for honorable purposes or what.
Then how accurate are their communication skills and habits. Some people are just sloppy communicators.
In China, Qx observed that rumors were often a lot more accurate a channel of communication than the newspapers. That's likely now, in our context, too.