To: Domestic Church
[e] = edward snowdon?
That is very good - when the first "Socities", [e], [5], banner, etc., posts happened, they followed the IP post(s) ...
HOWEVER refs & more taunts to @Snowden then FOLLOWED.
Future proves past?
Taken in that context, the inference is "hey buddy, you really like Russia, you know they're still after you, right? Like now? Like John (Barlow) last week? Putin won't protect you forever, c'mon in out of the cold, JA can tell you, Gitmo is quick & painless ... when you're in the other chair(s) ..."
BTW there were clearly important but low-key meetings last week with high(est) level Ruskies intel and our (USA) folks in DC.
To: Steven W.
There has been somewhat of a debate if Snowden is a good guy or a bad guy. Based off of the posts of Q, I would say he is a bad guy. However many continue to insist he is a white hat.
1,031 posted on
02/10/2018 4:45:18 PM PST by
MNDude
(This is story is so tragic,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson