Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MagnoliaB

The irony. I posted a link to a fact-filled article. Yet I’m accused of not being factual.

I request facts in return, and the Rothschild-haters invariably find a way to avoid even trying to supply facts. You’re not the first and will probably not be the ladt. You illustrate the tactic: ‘if you have no facts, use ad hominem.’


172 posted on 02/05/2018 11:04:02 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter

I have an idea. Why don’t you start some Rothschild thread and defend them over there? You claim to be a “reformed liberal” who only became conservative upon noting the treatment of George Bush. Well, The Bushes are new World Order types and they have fallen from favor.

Again, instead of spamming up the Q discussion, go have your Rothschild party on another thread. It’s easy.


203 posted on 02/05/2018 11:49:41 AM PST by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson