[sargon]

mountebank: a person who deceives others, especially in order to trick them out of their money

It doesn't seem like that is what "Q" is trying to do.

What I find most interesting is not the debate over whether Q is "valid" or not, but rather that some who don't believe in Q are willing to waste so much of their time convincing others that Q is a fraud.

I find myself firmly in the "Q agnostic" camp at the moment—but at the same time, methinks the "He-Man Q-Hater's Club" doth protest too much...

[Vision Thing]

I, too, am a Q sceptic, but I find Q to be intriguing, entertaining, and most importantly educational (as in Q encourages us to think for ourselves instead of indoctrinating us, making effective use of the Socratic Method).

And the Q naysayers are fighting Q way too hard. It's to the point that I have to question the true motivation of each naysayer.

[nopardons]

Montebank also means conman and the con isn't always for money, though you can count on the fact that the explainers, on YouTube are making money from it all.

I don't post to many Q threads, just a few here and there and am NOT trying to convince anyone that all of this is hogwash, which it is.

I just post my opinion and also, often salient facts.

And it's my time; worry about yourself!