The date is obviously wrong. I used the date that shows on the article.
1 posted on
01/28/2018 3:37:23 PM PST by
mairdie
To: sauropod
2 posted on
01/28/2018 3:40:14 PM PST by
sauropod
(I am His and He is mine.)
To: ADemocratNoMore
3 posted on
01/28/2018 3:46:55 PM PST by
mairdie
To: mairdie
These days, it all depends on how the Date presents itself....
4 posted on
01/28/2018 3:49:28 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: mairdie
It's a terrible article and not a good excerpt either since we all know Alinsky's rules and citing Rule #1 doesn't tell us anything about what the article is going to say.
The major point about understanding Alinsky's rules is not "nyey, nyey, nyeh I can't hear you." The rules apply to anyone trying to advocate change. In this case it is patriotic Americans and constitutional conservatives who want change. The tactics work just as well for us as they do for leftists, and that is what the author should have been writing about.
To: mairdie
I dunno. I tried to comment and comments are closed. It may be that old (and Kurt that prescient).
6 posted on
01/28/2018 4:00:35 PM PST by
sparklite2
(See more at Sparklite Times)
To: mairdie
Worth reading out loud to your wife!
8 posted on
01/28/2018 4:13:54 PM PST by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
To: mairdie
I think the date is correct (I started to comment, but it’s closed). (Plus there’s a line in there about war with Australia (I think re: accepting the immigrants in an Obama bargain). Still contemporary, though. Well worth reading. Even again.
19 posted on
01/28/2018 4:59:50 PM PST by
StAntKnee
(Add your own danged sarc tag)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson