Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In any war with North Korea, the A-10 is a powerful weapon
Asia Times ^ | JANUARY 25, 2018 | STEPHEN BRYEN

Posted on 01/26/2018 8:58:53 PM PST by Leaning Right

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: According2RecentPollsAirIsGood

Pairs of A-10s flying out of Whiteman AFB scream over Lake of the Ozarks nearly every week. Nearly everyone outside stops to look up when they fly over.


41 posted on 01/27/2018 5:30:07 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MCF

All ou4 military branches suffer from scope creep, which is why budgets don’t cover wants, which leaves needs and have to have so underfunded. The bean counters use money for wants, not have to haves or needs


42 posted on 01/27/2018 5:37:43 AM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

FYI: 20mm, not .50 Cal.


43 posted on 01/27/2018 5:44:38 AM PST by MortMan (We are living in interesting times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: allendale
If attack aircraft were violins, then the Warthog would be the finest Stradivarius.

And yet the idiots in the Air Force who get erections over overpriced, under-produced money pits with wings want to kill the finest ground attack aircraft ever produced and replace it with a bunch of buzzing mosquitoes.

Scrap the generals. Keep the Warthog.

44 posted on 01/27/2018 5:49:40 AM PST by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

It’s not complicated.

The F-22 is a strategic air superiority fighter, like the F-15 it replaces.

The F-35 is a tactical air superiority fighter, like the F-16 it replaces.


45 posted on 01/27/2018 5:51:16 AM PST by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MCF
"The Army should operate all ground support aircraft for it’s needs. The Air Force’s job should be strictly air superiority and Strategic bombing. Let the Army decide what type aircraft they need."

Correct. The Key West Agreement of 1947 is overdue for scrapping!

46 posted on 01/27/2018 6:02:39 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Build KateÂ’s Wall! Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Actually, the Hog has a 30mm cannon.


47 posted on 01/27/2018 6:06:20 AM PST by Redleg Duke (Build KateÂ’s Wall! Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

They say that memory goes first. I forget what goes second...


48 posted on 01/27/2018 6:14:19 AM PST by MortMan (We are living in interesting times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Justa
WRONG !
The F-35 should be returned to the builder, and we should get our money back !
49 posted on 01/27/2018 6:23:29 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

Great video.......As a side note, I’m about 8 miles from Selfridge ANG and they have 22 A-10s on base


50 posted on 01/27/2018 6:24:53 AM PST by Hot Tabasco (My cat is not fat, she is just big boned........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

The Air Force doesn’t like the idea of close support aircraft to protect troops on the ground compared to the glory of air to air combat.

IMHO the air to air fighter jockeys may soon be obsoleted by drones. But that is another argument.

There is no substantial amount of AF brass who want the messy work of close air support. They believe they can handle it from 20 thousand feet with guided bombs. Guided bombs are great for static targets, but a close support mini cannon with a pilot strapped onto it is a truly fearsome thing to enemy troops.


51 posted on 01/27/2018 8:56:20 AM PST by wildbill (Quis Custodiet ipsos custodes? Who watches the watchmen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCF

This close ground support of army and marines is a fight that the AF didn’t want, but they didn’t want the Army or Marines to have their own air force either.

Congress was convinced to move the planes in the military mostly into the AF to consolidate costs, training, and maintenance etc.


52 posted on 01/27/2018 8:58:55 AM PST by wildbill (Quis Custodiet ipsos custodes? Who watches the watchmen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Justa

I thought the F35 is supposedly supposed to be able to do the same job as the, A-10, as well. Although it has fallen way short in everything it is supposed to be able to do.


53 posted on 01/27/2018 9:48:27 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

The Luftwaffe had but 1 or 2 Stuka units on the Eastern Front by 1944. They were getting shot down in bunches. The FW-190A and the HE-129 were carrying the load in ground attack missions. If they’d had more Henschels there wouldn’t have been any Stukas. It was obsolete.


54 posted on 01/27/2018 10:39:09 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

All questions that require a level of HUMINT to answer. We never seem to have that. When we do, some leaked or politician (I repeat myself) gets them all killed.


55 posted on 01/27/2018 10:41:16 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

“Always been kind of curious as to why the F22 was supposed to be baddest thing to take to the air, a few short years ago, but now we need the F35.”

Simple really. Most of the program money is spent on R&D & Test. The buy is a contracted price — make money or not. Lockheed-Martin won the contract for the F-22A and later the F-35A/B/C. When congress terminated the F-22 in favor of the F-35 it was basically the same prefered direction that Lockheed wanted. Aerospace comanies are essentially big Engineering firms. If they could make profits without actually delivering aircraft I think they would.


56 posted on 01/27/2018 11:06:01 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

30mm, not 20mm.


57 posted on 01/27/2018 11:10:55 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Yep. Brain cramp on my part.


58 posted on 01/27/2018 11:22:18 AM PST by MortMan (We are living in interesting times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson