To: txhurl
I think he just reauthorized Federal civil rights asset forfeiture laws in criminal cases. Not sure about civil. And not sure if there was any new legislation. Only Congress could do that. I guess it could apply to corruption. Not sure if it would apply to all the things listed in this E.O. Somehow i suspect this E.O. only applies to foreigners. But they could use it to roll up connected domestic criminals I guess.
Like. Hey, you want your eight million samolians back? Let's chat. What do you know about Hillary? Like that.
176 posted on
01/26/2018 7:16:17 PM PST by
bagster
(Even bad men love their mamas.)
To: bagster
Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.
179 posted on
01/26/2018 7:18:35 PM PST by
tiki
To: bagster
Do you ever wonder if this asset seizure, ours and bin Salman’s, could easily slip into a shootout?
186 posted on
01/26/2018 7:26:25 PM PST by
txhurl
(Banana Republicans, as far as the eye can see)
To: bagster
346 posted on
01/27/2018 9:01:24 AM PST by
gnarledmaw
(Hive minded liberals worship leaders, sovereign conservatives elect servants.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson