Replies

-- Can you then post the messages in the same simple to understand order that I did please? It's all very confusing and I would like to see the actual messages in chronological order. --

Have you viewed qcodefag.github.io/?

I mean, sure, I can try my hand at reformatting that. I too found the presentation confusing, but after a bit of time between qcodefag and the source at 8chan (clickable links from qcodefag), I figured out how to order and ascribe remarks.

Jan 25 2018 12:27:51 Anonymous : Trump just tweeted. [22] minute delta marker.
Jan 25 2018 12:31:36 Q : Amazing coincidence? Always close after crumb drops.
Jan 25 2018 12:34:26 Q [referring to his 12:31:36] : POTUS' statement and focus [Tweet] on the UK should SCARE a lot of people. It signifies something VERY IMPORTANT. VERY VERY VERY IMPORTANT.
Jan 25 2018 12:42:56 Anonymous : MI6 PLAYED BALL they did the spying for us on us citizens at our direction as they always do They ratted out their deep state masters?
Jan 25 2018 12:44:04 Q : + more, a lot more.

Each message has an ID number in the header.

Replies sometime refer to messages by ID number, or a string of messages using a string of ID numbers. Message ID number references appears with a couple of angle brackets, e.g. ">>158223" in Q's 12:31:36 (message ID #158263) is a reference to the mesage ID# of Anonymous's 12:27:51

Okay, now I see. But I still don't see Q's message before the Trump tweet. The crumb. Can you do this since you know where it all is? I think it would make it easier for everybody to understand. And did I at least get the interpretation in the ball park? Like this:

1. Q crumb.

2. Trump tweet.

3. Q follow up.

That would make it so simple. Thank you, if you choose to do that, goodman. :)