[Enlightened1]

No doubt the SJWs (Social Justice Warriors) are probably programing the Google A.I.

[mylife]

Piss off Alexa

[BenLurkin]

FALSANI:

Who’s Jesus to you?

(He laughs nervously)

OBAMA:

Right.

Jesus is an historical figure for me, and he’s also a bridge between God and man, in the Christian faith, and one that I think is powerful precisely because he serves as that means of us reaching something higher.

And he’s also a wonderful teacher. I think it’s important for all of us, of whatever faith, to have teachers in the flesh and also teachers in history.

[Salman]

I just typed "Who is Jesus Christ" into Google and the #1 hit is a page with that exact title by the Jehovah's Witnesses, followed by similar results from the LDS and so forth.

Is this Google gimmicking the result or merely a reflection of the fact that these sort of groups put up a lot of pages with the exact title "Who is Jesus Christ"?

It's a search engine not a discerner of truth.

[mylife]

We are way beyond high level compilers now for software,

Now you mash a button and it writes the code for the social lie

Any jazzhole can monkey with the code

[heterosupremacist]

Enlightened1 wrote: No doubt the SJWs (Social Justice Warriors) are probably programing the Google A.I. Anybody so uninformed who would consider Alexa as a source, deserves what they get (or don't get!)

[bigbob]

Need to hack Alexa to change its activation code to “Jesus”

[GJones2]

> Anyhow, Google’s A.I pulls every major religion’s figure/Sage but the Christians? Coincidence? I don’t think so.

That really is a glaring omission. At a minimum it shows neglect in assessing importance.

[GJones2]

> Google's A.I. for the most part uses Wikipedia to answer questions. Which is crazy because (wiki = edit) anyone can edit Wikipedia. <

Actually, the situation could be worse -- having leftist sites as authorities and no chance to edit them. :-) With Wikipedia, there's at least a chance that the more glaring distortions will be corrected.

I don't doubt that different persons would find different things to dispute in the rest of the article (which I haven't read), but it seems to me that the Wikipedia "Jesus" article begins fairly well:

"Jesus[e] (c. 4 BC – c. 30 / 33 AD), also referred to as Jesus of Nazareth and Jesus Christ,[f] was a Jewish preacher and religious leader.[12] He is the central figure of Christianity. Most Christians believe him to be the incarnation of God the Son and the awaited Messiah (Christ) prophesied in the Old Testament." [Wikipedia]

If Google A.I. had quoted that, that wouldn't have been bad as a quick answer.

[GJones2]

Though the video test has an answer for "Allah", I'm curious to know if it has one for "Mohammed" (or -- important to Judaism and some other religions -- "Abraham" and "Moses"). I don't have any voice features enabled on my computer, but perhaps someone who does would try those names. Thanks.

A problem with "Mohammed" is that there are various spellings and pronunciations. I learned the spelling "Mohammed" growing up (and just confirmed that spelling in three encyclopedias of the middle of the last century). Wikipedia, though, now spells it as "Muhammad". Anyway, please try those variations and see if one shows up.

By the way, in my opinion English should be able to have its own anglicizing conventions, and not keep switching to conform to current trends in other languages (note that "Jesus" is said in widely varying ways in modern languages, and so far in English we're retaining its traditional English one). For a 2000-plus-post thread in which I argue against this trend of continually changing our traditional English spellings to match trends in spelling them in other languages -- no need to read all the posts, of course :-) -- see this language forum thread: Dictionary.com forum.