Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman; ransomnote

” heartily wish I had because Q drop #15 dated October 31, 2017 (excerpted) has this to say:

11.3 - Podesta indicted
11.6 - Huma indicted “

Yep, one of his early failed predictions. Not sure why people keep believing he is credible when he failed so spectacularly so early on.


I wonder if we should think outside the box on this.
Help me remembe: didn’t Q mention something about the past being the future or something like that? I can’t find the post where I read it. Perhaps the 11-3 and 11-6 dates are 2018?

That’d be a long time to wait for an arrest though.


69 posted on 01/25/2018 4:22:54 PM PST by KittenClaws ( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: KittenClaws

“I wonder if we should think outside the box on this.”

Why should we “think outside the box”?

He made a clear unmistakable prediction for an exact date. It can’t be 2018 because on 11/2/2017 he was saying “wait for tomorrow”. He was wrong. Game over.


88 posted on 01/25/2018 11:31:05 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: KittenClaws

In a subsequent post Q specified the arrests would occur in Nov 17.


93 posted on 01/26/2018 3:03:19 AM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson