Q has also said that some fake information was necessary along the way.
For example, if Podesta thought he was being arrested on a certain date, he could be forced into making a dumb move in response. Sort of how the news of the missing texts might be fake to expose leakers.
If none of this bigger stuff comes true, then we will know Q is a fake. But, if the general gist of it is accurate, then he might indeed be in the loop.
I see many posts about things that I don’t care about or think are irrelevant. My reaction to them is to not click on them, and I certainly don’t appoint myself sheriff to police the conversation. Why do you feel th need to do that? There are plenty of other threads to enjoy.
Why do *some* Q believers question my input on the threads when I have added many factual items, the existence of which many if not most Q believers previously denied?