“Many in the Q community believe this may be an attempt to hide ankle bracelets used to track those indicted but not arrested.”
Isn’t an ankle bracelet a condition of bail?
And isn’t bail a part of formal arraignment?
And isn’t arraignment necessarily when indictments are unsealed?
And aren’t all arraignments public by law, no exceptions?
What is the legal procedure where someone wears an ankle bracelet when they have not been arraigned?
Your points are all accurate and have been made before. LE can’t just sneak an ankle bracelet onto a person hush-hush. The procedure is entailed, as you described.
Also, while bell-bottoms could conceal an ankle bracelet, those gray support-boots couldn’t. The ankle bracelet is bulky, and would make even fastening those boots a challenge. If successful, the boot would bulge way out on one side. It’s obvious from the pics that this isn’t the case.
“And aren’t all arraignments public by law, no exceptions?”
Yes, but don’t let that get in the way of a good fantasy story. Conservatives need to indulge in wish fulfillment from time to time as well, I guess.
What about when you’re an enemy combatant?
Based on your involvement with foreign agents in a conspiracy to assassinate a president?
What does that procedure look like?