Until you know how to post links, to display the results of your research, you will find few if any that trust your research. Your claim that Q knew who I was turned out to be even more baseless and disappointing. So far you're batting close to .000
Despite that admitted gap in my gung fu mastery, I have never lost an argument on the internet. I have conceded points when proven wrong, but that in itself, makes a man's overall gung fu stronger. You will never defeat me, goodman. I advise caution.
you will find few if any that trust your research.
My research is not the point. I already told you, I rely mostly on the research of the more competent. Just as you do. What is at issue here is my ability to take that research and make a convincing argument, baffling my opponent at every turn. Just as I am doing right now. Your mind lives in a restricted box and that is why you are an unworthy opponent. My mind is vast and can go to places you have never even heard of. It is how I can accept the possibility of Q.
Which reminds me. You never responded to my last question to you about Q. Did you think about what I said? This is a test of your intellectual honesty and will give me another clue in the puzzlement that is you. I like to know my opponent.
Your claim that Q knew who I was...
Oh my. You were actually serious when you said that? I thought you might have a sense of humor and were being ironical. At the time, I thought you did pretty good with that one. But you were serious. You thought I was really saying that Q was actually watching you and was under your bed or in your closet. Interesting. And another clue to solve you. No sense of humor. Check.
you're batting close to .000
Quite the opposite, grasshoppa.
:)
p.s. Where's Windflier? You better make the tag.