[Golden Eagle]

Well here is the FR thread I was referring to. Look at the parent post and the graphic. Does it not contain the text you referenced, and does it not show a date of 1/23/18?

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3625424/posts

Why should I believe this information was posted in December as you claimed?

[bagster]

Ahhhhh...excellent. Yes, I boggled when I saw that too. Then I realized it wasn't from Q, but some other "Anonymous" of which there seem to be legion. That right there is clearly stated to be a "cut and paste" of the original Q post. But yes, that is the quote I was referring to. This anonymous is using it to lay out his case for something else.

An easy mistake to make. The original post exists, and it was dropped on Dec 14, six days after the alleged meeting took place.

Tell me this, before you see it, if in fact you ever do. Would that make you reconsider your opinion? I mean, even if it was dropped in January, wouldn't that give you pause? Who else was telling us about any secret meetings? Who else could possible know other than somebody attached to a very high level of intelligence of proximity to the President?

Seriously. Doesn't that say something?

In the meantime, I'm looking for a post with the original Q drop, but I really, really suck at research. No lie. I really do. My gung fu style is yappin.

I wish somebody would have mercy on me and post you the link. But I also think what you just posted should be sufficient to make my point.