1. You seem to have no appreciation at all for the FACT that it was the flakiest, most fringe groups that first, earliest and most accurately described who Hitler was, what he would become and do.
2. By the time evidence gets through your narrow and rigid filters, it has lost 20-85% or so of it's umph and detail, nuance, information, usefulness.
3. You seem to only accept evidence if it has been reviewed by a panel of 12 scientists, 12 atnys, 12 logicians, had all their finger prints verified; signed their verifications in their own blood; chiseled the basic facts in granite on prime time TV; been verified by a platoon of Heavenly angels and had the wild cheering acclaim of saints far and wide.
That may give you a smug feeling of safety and superiority. However, it will NOT protect you from getting bit in the rear by a false negative error. Your rear must have a lot of scars.
Wrong on every level. Maybe if you were to take the time to understand my position, you wouldn’t completely misrepresent it.
But that would be asking too much.