Posted on 01/24/2018 12:20:02 PM PST by ransomnote
Bms was kind enough to supply the correct date. That puts Q at 1 for 5. Not great odds, but not batting zero, either.
Incidentally, I figured out who Q is. Not telling, though. I don’t want the Q-ists to lose their cookies. But I will say this: it’s not who they think, and none of the possibilities floated by the Q-ists is correct.
Once you know, it’s so obvious. Can’t believe it took me this long.
Lol.
O.M.G.!!!! Thanks be to God! Thank you for our President!
Cool!!
Evidently so. Concrete between the ears is sad to see.
Believing in Q a little more than hoping in him now.
You’re clearly on a roll with the ‘being chronically wrong’ habit.
I don’t know why he needed attorneys in 9 countries. Most likely is to protect property that he has in those places, but could be something else.
What?! They’re going to be named too! They were in it up to their eyeballs!
I think this is the one I saw that first got my attention during the first week of November.
“but the Q stuff is all fake”
How can you tell?
So...On the QT and very hush hush. Mums the word. SSSHHHHH.
p.s. If Q knew six days after the secret meeting, which it appears he did, I believe that suggests he is very highly placed in at least the intelligence community or is some government functionary on the side of the Donald or is working in their interests. I also believe with the knowledge, approval, and guidance of the President himself.
How you can't see that and agree with it, boggles the mind.
TY. Local talker was talking about the names. He reads FR.
Not defending Comey, but one of my childhood friends is my “attorney.” I just can’t afford his hourly rate.
‘If you truly know, which of course you don’t’
Which, of course, I do. It’s not rocket surgery, lol.
Q has a source, but not nearly as well placed as the true believers imagine. That explains his abysmal track record: one out of five. Still as I said, it’s not five misses and zero hits. One out of five is better than nothing.
1. You seem to have no appreciation at all for the FACT that it was the flakiest, most fringe groups that first, earliest and most accurately described who Hitler was, what he would become and do.
2. By the time evidence gets through your narrow and rigid filters, it has lost 20-85% or so of it's umph and detail, nuance, information, usefulness.
3. You seem to only accept evidence if it has been reviewed by a panel of 12 scientists, 12 atnys, 12 logicians, had all their finger prints verified; signed their verifications in their own blood; chiseled the basic facts in granite on prime time TV; been verified by a platoon of Heavenly angels and had the wild cheering acclaim of saints far and wide.
That may give you a smug feeling of safety and superiority. However, it will NOT protect you from getting bit in the rear by a false negative error. Your rear must have a lot of scars.
Awesome. Also, that info is all over the net. It should be well disseminated by now. The mainstreams will be forced to talk about the secret society soon. Keep up the pressure.
Or 9 lawyers world wide.
Wrong on every level. Maybe if you were to take the time to understand my position, you wouldn’t completely misrepresent it.
But that would be asking too much.
First I heard was today. I’m late to the party. :) Bad start to the New Year in my fam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.