Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
Well. For example.

These "Q" threads partly come down to a conflict between those who are "For Q" and those who are "Against Q".

And your screen name is "for-q-Clinton"

I found it ironical that you seem to be "agqainst Q" yet your screen name says "for Q".

Even though I get it's really a clever way of saying FU to Clinton.

Do you see it?

:)

152 posted on 01/21/2018 5:12:43 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

Ah.... That’s funny.


153 posted on 01/21/2018 5:15:01 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

Looks like #releasethememo is losing momentum. The way some reps were talking, it seemed like a surety we’d be reading it by Monday. I was hoping enough destruction of the RATS would happen that CINC would have to explain their empty seats during the SOTU.

‘Well, let’s just say Chuckie had a sudden urge for bologna sandwiches and moldy oranges, and lots of Obama groupies did, too.’


156 posted on 01/21/2018 5:22:13 AM PST by txhurl (Banana Republicans, as far as the eye can see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson