Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Telepathic Intruder

The reason I ask the question is that perhaps the single most important technology needed to make the 21st century successful is one that collapses the cost of energy to a fraction of current costs in the way steam did for the 19th century and internal combustion and electric generators did for the 20th century.

so my thought was that perhaps less energy might be needed to produce gama rays to produce inertial confinement fusion than current lasers. Guess not.

Part the great excitement of the 1950’s-1960’s was that fission based nuclear power was dropping so fast that scientists thought that one day in the not distant future-—energy would be too cheap to meter. Three Mile Island in 1979 killed that idea because of redundant safety features required of new reactors jacked up their prices and kept them there.

Part of the excitement of the 4g nuclear community today is that thorium reactor designs present the possibility of the dropping electricity costs to below .01@kw/hr.
.

I’ve just noticed a design I’ve not seen before. NASA is testing a mini nuclear reactor with the acronym KRUSTY (kilowatt reactor using stirling engine).
https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/nasa-kilopower-nuclear-reactor-test/

Is there anything in that design that you could see that would significantly drop the price of nuclear power.

(Part of the game of killing costs is to be able to mass produce a reactor. But safety issues may well kill any idea of mass producing mini nukes that are not walk away safe like the thorium reactors.)

Therefor can refrigerator sized thorium reactors be produced and mass produced?


22 posted on 01/21/2018 2:34:42 PM PST by ckilmer (q e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

The promise of dirt-cheap energy through fusion has been like a carrot that keeps moving farther away as we reach toward it. Fission has inherent problems. Its fuel is by nature radioactive and its byproducts even more so. Loss of containment is a constant threat. Fusion eliminates both of these problems (or most of it, since tritium is mildly radioactive). Progress is being made, though. We could build a large fusion reactor today that would run on deuterium you can get from sea water, but it would cost $$$ that apparently no one is willing to invest in. But once we have it, it will be virtually free energy (since sea water doesn’t cost that much), and pollution free as well.


23 posted on 01/21/2018 2:53:53 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson