I still say we need to view these things with a healthy skepticism.
Yes, view with healthy skepticism and remember there is something called DISINFORMATION.
“I still say we need to view these things with a healthy skepticism.”
I totally agree. That is a MUST.
(I started off with deep skepticism. But over the last few months I have become fairly convinced due to the fact that multiple sources seem to be painting the same big picture.)
“I still say we need to view these things with a healthy skepticism.”
Absolutely, just like pretty up everything else you read on the internet. The trick is to filter through the BS to get to the truth out there.
FBIAnon made a bunch of predictions that never came true.
I only casually follow Q posts.
Q seems to be a Rorschach test. The posts are vague and broad so everyone “fills in the blank” with their own interpretations. Psychic scammers do something similar. It’s called “Cold Reading”.
The same thing is going on with ‘The Memo”.
We haven’t seen it so everyone is filling in what they want it to be about.
It may be something. It may be nothing. One mans’ ‘bombshell’ is another mans’ dud. And most 'bombshells' have been duds.
We can only wait and see…
Being skeptical to the point of obsessively trying to avoid a false positive error is no excuse for making it virtually certain you get bit in the butt by a false negative error.
Skepticism is good - however, I haven’t heard trump and company saying much of anything about it and he’s surely aware......could mean a number of things but it gives me hope.